Two papers a person each month, from October 1
The Decoder reports that, from October 1, 2026, the preprint site arXiv allows one person only two submissions in a calendar month. A separate cap stays in place: since 2024, an author may have at most three active submissions at once.
The monthly limit applies across every category, and only to the person who submits. Co-authors are not counted. A rejected paper still uses a slot, because moderation time was already spent. If the authors delete a paper before publication, they get that slot back.
[1]
September was the busiest month on record
arXiv attributes the rule to the rise in submissions, partly driven by AI tools. September 2016 brought 9,869 submissions, September 2024 brought 20,569, and September 2026 brought 40,363. That surge generated nearly 9,000 support tickets for staff and moderators. In cs.AI alone, submissions grew more than sixfold in two years. September 2026 was the single busiest month in arXiv's history.
[1]A few authors take the moderators' time
Volunteer moderators are seeing more thin, narrowly focused papers, papers sliced into small pieces, and dense text written by AI. Thomas G. Dietterich, chair of the arXiv Editorial Advisory Council, calls those volunteer moderators the backbone of quality control.
He writes that a relatively small proportion of authors submit a large number of low-quality papers and consume a disproportionate share of moderator time. That is unfair to authors who still submit substantive papers: their papers can be delayed for days or weeks. On Bluesky he adds that some authors submit dozens of papers.
Dietterich also hopes the cap will curb papers that add one ablation or a minor tweak to an architecture. arXiv calls the rule a temporary measure until its own moderation tools can scale. He says he hopes the cap can later be raised or dropped.
[1]The rules had already tightened this year
In November 2025, arXiv tightened the rules for computer-science papers: review articles and position papers must go through peer review. In May 2026, Dietterich announced a one-year ban for authors whose papers clearly contain unverified language-model output, such as fabricated citations.
Conferences are facing the same volume. ICLR 2027 had already received about 50,000 abstracts before its deadline. ICLR 2026 had about 19,500 valid submissions. Among roughly 5,000 accepted papers at NeurIPS 2025, GPTZero found at least 100 fabricated citations, even though each paper had at least three reviewers.
After 25 years at Cornell, arXiv is leaving. Since July 1, 2026 it has been becoming an independent nonprofit. In late September, the Simons Foundation International, XTX Markets, and the Siegel Family Endowment pledged $17.2 million in total, spread over three to five years. arXiv plans to spend part of the money on technical upgrades, with the focus on AI-generated content.
[1]