Rohan Paul

@rohanpaul_ai

Pangram, the AI-text detector, missed 79.8% of scientific abstracts rewritten by Meta's Muse-Glimmer, while flagging just 1 of 5,000 human abstracts. In a new paper from Tokyo Metropolitan University, reseaerchers find the share of AI-rewritten abstracts that Pangram misses depends strongly on the LLM version Shows that it caught 93.5% of GPT-5 rewrites but missed 79.8% from another new model. Its miss rate depended mostly on which model did the rewriting.
打开原帖#511482
  1. Research

    Yann LeCun: @Helios_Hua Nice work
  2. Industry

    Mustafa Suleyman: Super Intelligence must be contained... Today, this is an…
  3. Industry

    Databricks: Admins can now configure coding agents in one place with Unity Gateway